I hate this shit….sometimes, it’s enough for me to go completely cynical on any kind of change that could be possible in this country. Sometimes, even off capitalism
Read this: India Microcredit Faces Collapse From Defaults
Basically, microfinance organizations (as usual, the middlemen who take money from banks and distribute it to the poor) get too aggressive on loans, distribute too much money without adequate checks on whether the borrower can make the payments, charge ridiculously exorbitant rates which add to the inability of the borrowers to pay up, and then use coercive means to try and get the payments back which basically drags the poor into even more wretched poverty which they were trying to escape in the first place. And then people flee or commit suicide because they can’t pay up. Add politicians to this ultra-aggressive capitalistic, money-grabbing clusterfuck who encourage borrowers not to repay the loans since apparently, the terms of the loan were absolutely unacceptable and the people who suffer are the banks who tried to enter the microfinance in the first place. Jesus Christ dickheads ! If the same model of loan sanctioning which you used in the urban areas worked amongst the rural poor, don’t you think they would have taken the loans a long time before. SHGs is a design of the solution, not the concept. You still need to lend to people with the power and the propensity to pay it back.If you keep adding middlemen in your structure without them undertaking any risk, understanding any shred of the original concept or basically looking at the business as a way to grab whatever they can with minimum intervention, this is what you get.
If you read Mohammed Yunus’ book on the original concept of microfinance, you know how far we have come from there. In the wrong direction. This is not to say, it’s not a viable business. Or that an 18% interest is too large. It’s about building a business which is sustainable. For the banks. For the microfinance partners. And for the borrowers. So that’s just one thing: Are you giving a loan that people can pay back? In terms of either volume of loans or rate of interest? And the lack of that concept in the retail loans industry seems to be the only thing that seems to be well-reflected in this industry.
That’s why I love Kiva.org. It works. Not only do people lend directly to the borrower (The actual process is of repaying the microfinance organization for the loan that it gave the borrower. The details are here) which makes the microfinance organization, adopt a more facilitating role as well, but also they award fellowships to students who volunteer to work with various microfinance partners around the world. This allows Kiva to keep its ears on the ground. Simple. Brilliant. Ethical. Profitable. The best part of Kiva I love? None of the loans given to a borrower go into covering Kiva’s operational expenses. For that, they ask for a separate donation. Which keeps their operational expenses really really lean. The point? You want to make money from the poor? Change your model….you cant sell a business loan to a rural poor person the way you sell a car loan to me.
I wonder if getting the UID thing to scale will solve that solution. I’ll probably do a brain dump on that in a subsequent post

